Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Quantum Physics question . . . Metaphysics answer.
I’ve decided to start my first post off with some deep considerations. Quantum physics deep. I’ll say now that there is a good chance I’ll end up with a number of posts on the subjects of quantum physics or metaphysics, but I'll try to convey concepts in layman’s terms as much as possible for the metaphysically challenged.
We have an online survey feature as a part of our work’s intranet that allows anyone to post a question and poll other staff for responses etc. I was mildly surprised at one of the questions anonymously posted, which asked:
“To what extent do YOU think the various theories emerging regarding depths beyond human physical-material existence, which are elegantly explained scientifically, are indeed key players in the equations controlling mankind’s intellectual behaviour?”
What I got out of that was:
“emerging theories indicate that mankind’s intellectual behavior may be influenced by the same laws that govern the physical existence – To what extent do you think this is true?”
To which I responded:
“Within the arena of my current understanding that all things of form and apparent interactions in the physical realm are only the result of interactions in the ethereal realm (and in some case the subatomic), and that our thoughts, being ethereal, affecting the subatomic and causing results in the physical, are solely influenced by the physical realm (currently anyway), a feedback loop is created that allows for the summing up our physical universe in scientific equations. Because of this feedback loop, our thoughts and behaviors (and in fact all possible outcomes in the physical universe) are constrained to a predictable set of outcomes. So from the original question – the equations that act on the physical are indeed key players by overtly affecting the physical which is what we entirely base our thoughts upon, thus affecting our behaviors. As we unravel this phenomenon, and come to the realization that this feedback loop is the controlling equation of our physical universe, the next logical step would be to ask “how do we break this feedback loop and what happens when we do?” Long ago a wise man came to the realization of this feedback loop phenomenon and gave it the term “hell” as he realized it was this feedback loop that caused all human suffering. The current definition of that term is no longer relevant, and there is no modern equivalent in the English language. “Heaven” was a term he used that describes what happens when we are able break out of this phenomenon, but again, this man was not fully understood at the time and the definition has become something else entirely. When this feedback loop is broken “en masse” in the human population, humanity will be thrust ahead in a massive evolutionary jump. So to answer the revised question, I feel pretty damn good about the whole situation, because where others may see an end, I see just the beginning. =)”
Then I read an interesting excerpt from an article that allowed me to provide some more insight into what I was trying to say, and thus updated my post with:
“I read an excerpt from an article from "New Scientist" that stated that physicists are coming to the conclusion that based on current 'working' quantum theories of the universe - that direct observation of Dark Matter and the inner mechanics of the universe is, or will be, destroying or collapsing the universe itself. This applies to my post as it has been known for some time in quantum physics that observation of something changes it. Observation causes potential to become actualized which is why I felt justified to give my bold claim in the previous post that physical is only affected by etheral - we are etheral observers creating our observations on the canvas of materiality (which is illusory). and since we base our thoughts wholly from this illusion, the feedback loop exists. Breaking this loop en masse will cause this illusion to be destroyed - the disappearance of our universe, the revelation of a new one (not really new, but new to our perceptions). Of course, if you believe that you are only made of the illusion then this will not apply to you and you will disappear along with the rest of the universe ; ) just kidding, the universe will remain for as long as it needs for the 'slow learners' as it cannot completely disappear while there is still faith in its 'reality.' Understanding the quantum mechanics of the universe destroys that faith as we begin to realize truths like the fact that there is no such thing as solid -- solid is an illusion, thus our universe being a solid structure (apart from dark matter and energy waves which seem to me to be etheral anyway) is also an illusion.”
There are vast implications if what I am saying is true. The biggest one being that it is us who create the universe; the universe does not create us. We sustain the universe daily by believing in it, and daily, our beliefs of it are reinforced through our perceptions. When we learn to believe in and perceive possibilities outside of our perceptions - to believe in miracles, we begin to breakdown those beliefs and miracles will begin to happen.
Consider it.
Michael K
We have an online survey feature as a part of our work’s intranet that allows anyone to post a question and poll other staff for responses etc. I was mildly surprised at one of the questions anonymously posted, which asked:
“To what extent do YOU think the various theories emerging regarding depths beyond human physical-material existence, which are elegantly explained scientifically, are indeed key players in the equations controlling mankind’s intellectual behaviour?”
What I got out of that was:
“emerging theories indicate that mankind’s intellectual behavior may be influenced by the same laws that govern the physical existence – To what extent do you think this is true?”
To which I responded:
“Within the arena of my current understanding that all things of form and apparent interactions in the physical realm are only the result of interactions in the ethereal realm (and in some case the subatomic), and that our thoughts, being ethereal, affecting the subatomic and causing results in the physical, are solely influenced by the physical realm (currently anyway), a feedback loop is created that allows for the summing up our physical universe in scientific equations. Because of this feedback loop, our thoughts and behaviors (and in fact all possible outcomes in the physical universe) are constrained to a predictable set of outcomes. So from the original question – the equations that act on the physical are indeed key players by overtly affecting the physical which is what we entirely base our thoughts upon, thus affecting our behaviors. As we unravel this phenomenon, and come to the realization that this feedback loop is the controlling equation of our physical universe, the next logical step would be to ask “how do we break this feedback loop and what happens when we do?” Long ago a wise man came to the realization of this feedback loop phenomenon and gave it the term “hell” as he realized it was this feedback loop that caused all human suffering. The current definition of that term is no longer relevant, and there is no modern equivalent in the English language. “Heaven” was a term he used that describes what happens when we are able break out of this phenomenon, but again, this man was not fully understood at the time and the definition has become something else entirely. When this feedback loop is broken “en masse” in the human population, humanity will be thrust ahead in a massive evolutionary jump. So to answer the revised question, I feel pretty damn good about the whole situation, because where others may see an end, I see just the beginning. =)”
Then I read an interesting excerpt from an article that allowed me to provide some more insight into what I was trying to say, and thus updated my post with:
“I read an excerpt from an article from "New Scientist" that stated that physicists are coming to the conclusion that based on current 'working' quantum theories of the universe - that direct observation of Dark Matter and the inner mechanics of the universe is, or will be, destroying or collapsing the universe itself. This applies to my post as it has been known for some time in quantum physics that observation of something changes it. Observation causes potential to become actualized which is why I felt justified to give my bold claim in the previous post that physical is only affected by etheral - we are etheral observers creating our observations on the canvas of materiality (which is illusory). and since we base our thoughts wholly from this illusion, the feedback loop exists. Breaking this loop en masse will cause this illusion to be destroyed - the disappearance of our universe, the revelation of a new one (not really new, but new to our perceptions). Of course, if you believe that you are only made of the illusion then this will not apply to you and you will disappear along with the rest of the universe ; ) just kidding, the universe will remain for as long as it needs for the 'slow learners' as it cannot completely disappear while there is still faith in its 'reality.' Understanding the quantum mechanics of the universe destroys that faith as we begin to realize truths like the fact that there is no such thing as solid -- solid is an illusion, thus our universe being a solid structure (apart from dark matter and energy waves which seem to me to be etheral anyway) is also an illusion.”
There are vast implications if what I am saying is true. The biggest one being that it is us who create the universe; the universe does not create us. We sustain the universe daily by believing in it, and daily, our beliefs of it are reinforced through our perceptions. When we learn to believe in and perceive possibilities outside of our perceptions - to believe in miracles, we begin to breakdown those beliefs and miracles will begin to happen.
Consider it.
Michael K
Saturday, January 17, 2009
1st Post (sort of)
This isn't really a real post, but just me going through the motions of being a blogger so I can get the feel for it. This is my first blog ever so I think it might take a little getting used to until I get it feeling 'just right.' I didn't have any plan or direction in mind for this blog at all - I'm just seeing what type of direction it might take on it's own.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)